🗄️ Oracle Corp. (ORCL) — Market Data¶
Sector: Enterprise Software / Cloud | Bars: 2,513 (2016-10-28 → 2026-10-28) | Periods: 41 (2016-08-31 → 2026-08-31) | Source filing: 10-Q (Filed 2026-09-11)
📈 Returns¶
| 1D | 1W | 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.73% | +11.93% | +4.90% | +13.31% | -11.77% | -25.84% | -48.64% | +39.44% | +49.57% |
📊 Key Statistics¶
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Last close | 144.54 (2026-10-28) |
| 52-week high | 285.46 |
| 52-week low | 114.50 |
| From 52-week high | -49.37% |
| Position in 52-week range | 18% |
| Highest price on record | 345.72 |
| Max drawdown (stored history) | -64.98% (2026-07-24) |
| Annualised volatility (1Y) | 58.02% |
| CAGR (stored history) | +14.24% |
| Avg Vol (30D) | 31.38M |
📋 Key Figures¶
| Metric | Latest quarter | TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.34B | $71.78B |
| Net Income | $4.76B | $18.92B |
| EPS (diluted) | — | 6.38 |
| Free CF | — | -$28.72B |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | — | 32.12% |
| Net margin | — | 26.36% |
| ROE | — | 28.34% |
| P/E | — | 23.4× |
Figures are per fiscal quarter. Filers report cash flow and many income items year-to-date and stop tagging the fourth quarter separately, so a discrete quarter is reconciled by differencing consecutive year-to-date figures — arithmetic on reported numbers, not an estimate. A blank cell means the company does not tag that concept.
📉 Drawdown from Peak¶
🌡️ Rolling Volatility¶
🎲 Daily Return Distribution¶
🗓️ Monthly Returns¶
Calendar-month returns; the year column chains its months, so it only appears for years covered from January onward.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -15.6 | -11.7 | +1.2 | +9.7 | +39.9 | -35.1 | -11.4 | +14.8 | -7.9 | +5.3 | -25.8 | ||
| 2025 | +2.0 | -2.4 | -15.8 | +0.7 | +17.6 | +32.1 | +16.1 | -10.9 | +24.4 | -6.6 | -23.1 | -3.5 | +17.0 |
| 2024 | +6.0 | -0.0 | +12.5 | -9.4 | +3.0 | +20.5 | -1.2 | +1.3 | +20.6 | -1.5 | +10.1 | -9.8 | +58.0 |
| 2023 | +8.2 | -1.2 | +6.3 | +1.9 | +11.8 | +12.4 | -1.6 | +2.7 | -12.0 | -2.4 | +12.4 | -9.3 | +29.0 |
| 2022 | -6.9 | -6.4 | +8.9 | -11.3 | -2.0 | -2.9 | +11.4 | -4.7 | -17.6 | +27.8 | +6.3 | -1.6 | -6.3 |
| 2021 | -6.6 | +6.8 | +8.8 | +8.0 | +3.9 | -1.1 | +11.9 | +2.3 | -2.2 | +10.1 | -5.4 | -3.9 | +34.8 |
| 2020 | -1.0 | -5.7 | -2.3 | +9.6 | +1.5 | +2.8 | +0.3 | +3.2 | +4.3 | -6.0 | +2.9 | +12.1 | +22.1 |
| 2019 | +11.2 | +3.8 | +3.0 | +3.0 | -8.6 | +12.6 | -1.2 | -7.5 | +5.7 | -1.0 | +3.0 | -5.6 | +17.3 |
| 2018 | +9.1 | -1.8 | -9.7 | -0.2 | +2.3 | -5.7 | +8.2 | +1.9 | +6.1 | -5.3 | -0.2 | -7.4 | -4.5 |
| 2017 | +4.3 | +6.2 | +4.7 | +0.8 | +1.0 | +10.5 | -0.4 | +0.8 | -3.9 | +5.3 | -3.6 | -3.6 | +23.0 |
| 2016 | +4.6 | -4.3 |
Annual overview¶
Each complete fiscal year side by side — the long view the quarterly charts below break down. Hover a bar for its exact figure. A series the company never reports (a dividend it does not pay) is left out rather than drawn at zero.
💰 Statements¶
📊 Profitability¶
Financial strength¶
Balance-sheet ratios on the latest twelve months, each marked strong / fair / weak against a conventional screening threshold. The thresholds are rules of thumb: a utility and a software company carry debt differently.
Piotroski F-score — the nine tests
| Test (this year vs. last) | Passed |
|---|---|
| Return on assets is positive | ✅ |
| Operating cash flow is positive | ✅ |
| Return on assets improved | ❌ |
| Operating cash flow exceeds net income | ✅ |
| Long-term debt ÷ assets fell | ✅ |
| Current ratio improved | ✅ |
| Share count did not grow | ❌ |
| Gross margin improved | — |
| Asset turnover improved | ❌ |
Valuation vs. its own history¶
Each multiple at today's price, on a rail running from its lowest to its highest TTM reading in the stored history. The tick is the median. Green is the cheapest third of its history, red the dearest — relative to itself, not to the market.
⚖️ Valuation¶
P/E Bands¶
DCF fair value¶
A two-stage discounted cash flow on a per-share base: ten years at a growth-stage rate taken from the company's own history, ten more at a terminal rate, each year discounted back to today. It answers "what is this worth if the past decade's growth roughly continues?" — not "what will it do?"
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Based on | EPS (diluted, TTM): $6.38 |
| Discount rate | 10.0% |
| Growth stage | 10 years at 11.8% (5Y EBITDA / share CAGR) |
| Terminal stage | 10 years at 4.0% |
| Growth-stage value | $69.88 |
| Terminal-stage value | $55.91 |
| Fair value | $125.79 |
Reverse DCF — what the price implies¶
Run the same model backwards: the growth-stage rate at which fair value equals today's price. Compare it with what the company has actually delivered. An implied rate far above the history means the price needs the future to be much better than the past.
| Based on | Per-share base | Fair value | Margin of safety | Price implies | Actual 5Y | Actual 3Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS (diluted, TTM) | $6.38 | $125.79 | -14.9% | 13.9% | +5.0% | +24.0% |
| Free cash flow per share (TTM) | $-9.57 | — | — | — | — | — |
Sensitivity¶
Fair value as the discount rate (rows) and growth-stage rate (columns) move around the base case, in bold. Green cells are above today's price of $144.54, red below. If only the corner cells justify the price, so does only an optimistic set of assumptions.
| Discount ↓ · Growth → | 7.8% | 9.8% | 11.8% | 13.8% | 15.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0% | $114.45 | $131.59 | $151.38 | $174.18 | $200.43 |
| 9.0% | $104.67 | $120.04 | $137.76 | $158.15 | $181.60 |
| 10.0% | $96.06 | $109.88 | $125.79 | $144.08 | $165.08 |
| 11.0% | $88.45 | $100.92 | $115.24 | $131.68 | $150.55 |
| 12.0% | $81.71 | $92.98 | $105.91 | $120.74 | $137.73 |
Per-share data¶
Compound annual growth over five, three and one fiscal years, then the last three fiscal years and the trailing twelve months, every figure per diluted share and split-adjusted. Price is the close on each fiscal year end, so its growth is a price return.
| Metric | 5Y | 3Y | 1Y | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS (diluted) | +5.0% | +24.0% | +34.3% | 3.71 | 4.34 | 5.83 | 6.38 |
| Revenue / share | +11.5% | +8.6% | +15.4% | 18.76 | 20.03 | 23.12 | 23.93 |
| Operating income / share | +7.0% | +14.3% | +14.6% | 5.44 | 6.17 | 7.07 | 7.69 |
| EBITDA / share | +11.8% | +19.7% | +28.9% | 6.55 | 7.52 | 9.69 | 10.83 |
| Free cash flow / share | — | — | — | 4.18 | -0.14 | -8.13 | -9.57 |
| Dividends / share | +14.4% | +14.4% | +20.0% | 1.56 | 1.65 | 1.99 | 1.98 |
| Book value / share | +53.1% | +235.0% | +104.4% | 3.08 | 7.14 | 14.59 | 22.26 |
| Price | +23.5% | +28.7% | +36.4% | 117.19 | 165.53 | 225.78 | 144.54 |
Cost of capital (WACC)¶
What investors require for funding the business, weighted by how it is funded. Equity's cost comes from CAPM, with beta measured on three years of weekly returns against VTI; debt's from the interest it actually paid, after tax.
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Risk-free rate (10Y Treasury, assumed) | 4.25% |
| Beta | 1.80 |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% |
| Cost of equity | 13.24% |
| Cost of debt (pre-tax) | 4.25% |
| Tax rate | 21.0% |
| Weights: equity / debt | 100.0% / 0.0% |
| WACC | 13.24% |
ROIC over the last twelve months is 61.3%, above the 13.2% WACC: each dollar reinvested earns more than it costs.
Disclaimer
A DCF is a model, not a measurement. Every output on this tab moves with its assumptions — the discount rate, the growth rate, the risk-free rate, the equity risk premium — all printed beside the result so you can redo it with your own. Not investment advice.
📥 Download¶
- orcl.csv — raw daily OHLCV, 2,513 rows
-
prices.json— the full history in the JSON shape the candlestick chart consumes -
analytics.json— pre-computed drawdown, rolling volatility and return histogram - orcl_financials.csv — reported quarterly statements, 41 periods
-
fundamentals.json— every derived series the charts on this page consume
📖 How to read these charts
Every term used on this page, in one place. Ratios are computed on trailing twelve months (the last four reported quarters) unless stated otherwise, so a single seasonal quarter never distorts them.
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| TTM | Trailing twelve months — the last four reported quarters added together. Used instead of a single quarter so seasonality and one-off quarters do not distort a ratio. |
| YoY | Year-on-year: this quarter against the same quarter a year earlier. |
| Gross margin | Revenue less the direct cost of the product, as a share of revenue. What the product itself earns before any company overhead. |
| Operating margin | Operating profit as a share of revenue — after R&D and SG&A, before interest and tax. |
| Net margin | Net profit as a share of revenue, after everything including tax. |
| EPS (diluted) | Net income per share, assuming every option and convertible is exercised. |
| FCF | Free cash flow: operating cash flow minus capital expenditure. The cash left over for dividends, buybacks and debt repayment. |
| ROE | Return on equity: profit ÷ shareholders' equity. Flattered by debt, since borrowing shrinks the denominator. |
| ROA | Return on assets: profit ÷ total assets. Unflattered by debt, and correspondingly lower. |
| ROIC | Return on invested capital: after-tax operating profit ÷ (debt + equity). The cleanest read on whether the business earns more than its capital costs. |
| P/E | Price ÷ earnings per share. Dollars paid for one dollar of annual profit. Undefined when earnings are negative. |
| P/S | Price ÷ revenue per share. Used where there is no profit to divide by. |
| P/B | Price ÷ book value per share (assets − liabilities). Informative for banks; close to meaningless for software. |
| EV | Enterprise value: market cap + total debt − cash. What buying the whole business outright would cost. |
| EV/EBITDA | Enterprise value ÷ earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Compares companies before financing and accounting choices diverge. |
| Drawdown | How far below its own running all-time high the price sits, in percent. |
| Volatility | Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised. A measure of how far the price typically wanders, not of which direction. |
| CAGR | Compound annual growth rate: the single yearly rate that turns the first close into the last. |
| Max drawdown | The deepest peak-to-trough fall in the stored history — the worst loss a buy-and-hold holder would have sat through. |
| EBITDA | Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation: operating income plus D&A. A rough proxy for cash earnings before financing choices. |
| SBC | Stock-based compensation: pay in shares rather than cash. A real cost to shareholders through dilution, though it never leaves the bank account. |
| WACC | Weighted average cost of capital: the return lenders and shareholders together require, weighted by how much of each funds the business. |
| Beta | How much a stock moves with the market: 1.5 means it has tended to move 1.5% for every 1% market move. Drives the cost of equity. |
| DCF | Discounted cash flow: the value today of future per-share earnings or cash flow, each year discounted by the required return. |
| Margin of safety | (Fair value − price) ÷ fair value. Positive means trading below the model's value; negative means above it. |
| Reverse DCF | The growth rate today's price implies, found by running the DCF backwards from the price. |
| Altman Z-score | A weighted mix of five balance-sheet and earnings ratios that predicts financial distress. Above 2.99 safe, below 1.81 distress. |
| Piotroski F-score | Nine pass/fail tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency, year over year. 7–9 is strong, 0–3 weak. |
| Percentile rank | The share of a multiple's own history at or below today's reading. 90 means dearer than nine periods in ten. |
Disclaimer
Price data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and provided as-is for research and educational use. It is not verified against an official exchange feed and must not be relied on for trading decisions.
Disclaimer
Figures come from SEC XBRL filings and are provided as-is for research and educational use. Concept mapping across filers is imperfect and restatements are not tracked; verify against the filing itself before relying on any number.